• Richard Parker
      1625 Eye Street, NW
      Washington, DC, 20006
      Phone: +1-202-383-5380
      Fax: +1-202-383-5414
  • Michael E. Antalics
      1625 Eye Street, NW
      Washington, DC, 20006
      Phone: +1-202-383-5343
      Fax: +1-202-383-5414
  • David Beddow
      1625 Eye Street, NW
      Washington, DC, 20006
      Phone: +1-202-383-5362
      Fax: +1-202-383-5414
  • Ben Bradshaw
      1625 Eye Street, NW
      Washington, DC, 20006
      Phone: +1-202-383-5163
      Fax: +1-202-383-5414
  • Andrew Frackman
      Times Square Tower
      7 Times Square
      New York, NY, 10036
      Phone: +1-212-326-2017
      Fax: +1-212-326-2061
  • Kenneth R. O'Rourke
      400 South Hope Street
      Los Angeles, CA, 90071
      Phone: +1-213-430-7281
      Fax: +1-213-430-6407
  • Ian Simmons
      1625 Eye Street, NW
      Washington, DC, 20006
      Phone: +1-202-383-5106
      Fax: +1-202-383-5414
PROFESSIONALS

  • Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
    Asiana Airlines 
    Capital One Financial Corporation 
    CIGNA Corporation
    ExxonMobil Corporation 
    Honeywell International, Inc.
    International Game Technology
    Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
    SanDisk Corporation
    SK hynix Inc. 
    Verizon Communications  
    Western Digital Corporation

US Antitrust and Competition

Insuring compliance with the antitrust laws in the United States can be a time-consuming and complex endeavor. Two different federal agencies -- the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice -- enforce multiple antitrust laws and sometimes disagree on enforcement policies and priorities. The mandates of these agencies frequently intersect with the missions of other federal agencies, including the Patent and Trademark Office, the Food and Drug Administration, and the Federal Communications Commission. Further complexity is introduced by the State Attorneys General, which enforce divergent state antitrust laws and emphasize varying enforcement priorities. Criminal sanctions for price-fixing, civil litigants seeking treble damages, and class actions further raise the stakes that companies face in the United States.

O'Melveny's US Antitrust and Competition Practice is well-positioned to guide companies through this daunting maze. O’Melveny offers unmatched breadth and quality of expertise in litigating antitrust cases in federal and state courts, representing companies before federal and state antitrust agencies, and counseling clients on the nuances of both federal and state antitrust laws. Our lawyers have extensive experience representing both companies and individuals facing criminal antitrust charges, litigating complex civil class actions, and obtaining regulatory approval of high-profile mergers. We provide ongoing counsel to clients facing complex and evolving business issues, including the design of antitrust-compliant licensing and distribution agreements and the development of legal strategies in precedent-setting price-fixing and monopolization cases.

Our lawyers augment their capabilities by partnering closely with renowned economists and consultants. Our advocacy and antitrust victories have set legal precedents, changed industry landscapes, and shaped antitrust policy worldwide. Indeed, our efforts have been recognized by organizations like Global Competition Review, Chambers USA, Legal 500, and the International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers. Further, many of our lawyers have distinguished themselves through their innovative efforts and leadership before the bench, at the negotiating table, and within the Bar. Within our ranks are veteran Executive Branch and Capitol Hill policy makers, some of the most respected litigators and regulatory antitrust attorneys, and experts in antitrust and competition policy in the United States.

O’Melveny’s antitrust team has successfully represented companies in many sectors of the economy, including aviation, banking, chemicals, defense, entertainment, health care, high technology, manufacturing, oil and gas, retailing, and telecommunications.

Key Facts

  • Global Competition Review’s 2012 edition of GCR 100―its guide to the world’s leading competition practices―lists O’Melveny’s DC practice in its “Elite” section for the third consecutive year, noting that the “strength of the firm’s [DC] antitrust team wins praise from rivals.” GCR lists our California antitrust practice in its “Highly Recommended” category, stating that O’Melveny “boasts one of California’s strongest antitrust practices.” GCR also highlights O’Melveny’s New York practice in its “Recommended” section, writing that our New York team “has made an impressive showing, especially in litigation matters.”
  • Chambers USA (2012) ranks O’Melveny’s antitrust practice as among the leading practices in California, DC, and Nationwide. Clients are quoted as stating, "their dedication to having subject matter expertise has been incredible," “their antitrust work has been outstanding; an ability to think outside the box and their persistence have produced incredible results for us,” and “they were so focused on our business objectives and knew how to target their legal advice so we achieved those."
  • Competition Law360 named O’Melveny a “Competition Group of the Year" in both 2011 and 2009.  
  • US News & World Report / Best Lawyers ranked our National Antitrust and our DC Antitrust practices in Tier 1 in its "Best Law Firms" survey (2012).
  • Legal 500 consistently recommends our Antitrust/Competition Practice for competition matters. Legal 500 USA (2012) recommends our national antitrust practice and notes that O'Melveny has “a well-rounded practice.” 
  • Chambers Global (2013) commends our global practice in the areas of Competition/European Law, China Competition/Antitrust (International Firms) and US Competition Law, stating that our team “has a high-profile Washington, DC practice and further impresses through its strength in Asia and presence in Brussels and London.” 
  • Our Washington, DC practice was chosen as the “Best Law Firm in Washington DC for Antitrust Work 2009/10” by Corporate INTL Magazine.
  • Benchmark Litigation: The Definitive Guide to America's Leading Litigation Firms and Attorneys (2010) ranks our national antitrust practice as one of the leading practices in the US.
  • O’Melveny’s Antitrust and Competition practice was shortlisted for Chambers USA Awards for Excellence in antitrust for 2010. In addition, practice co-chair Richard Parker was a finalist for the Award for Excellence in Antitrust in 2009. 
       

Practice Strengths

  • Cartels and criminal investigations
    • •  Global experience in amnesty/leniency programs in the US, EU, and Japan 
      •  Price fixing and bid rigging 
      •  Customer and market sharing
  • Civil litigation and advocacy
    • •  Direct and indirect purchaser class actions 
      •  Litigation between corporations alleging monopolization and other antitrust violations 
      •  Litigation at the crossroads of antitrust laws and intellectual property rights 
      •  Representing clients before the European Commission, the JFTC, FTC, DOJ and MOFCOM
  • Counseling and complianc
    • •  Comprehensive compliance audits and compliance programs 
      •  Exclusive dealing 
      •  Mergers and joint ventures
      •  Monopolization and abuse of market power 
      •  Patent and know-how licensing
      •  Purchasing agreements and monopsony power 
      •  Refusals to deal 
      •  Standard-setting organizations and trade association activities 
      •  Vertical price and non-price restraints
  • Mergers
    • •  Merger filings in all major global economies 
      •  Management of global filings 
      •  Advice on transactional structures 
      •  Complaints/third party representation
  • Monopolization/Abuse of dominance

SK hynix Inc. Asiana Airlines eBay Inc. Advanced Micro Devices Capital One Financial Corporation ExxonMobil Corporation Triton Coal Company Verizon Communications, Inc.